Models of 'ordinary' commuter trains are not commonly offered to British N scale modellers, but Japanese modellers have lots of them to choose from. While such trains may lack the charisma of express trains or the muscle of big freight locomotives, the fact is, these are the trains most of us spend out time travelling on! While not a very numerous class (13 E127-0s and 12 E127-100s were built) the E127 looks to me every inch the unremarkable sort of train we wouldn't miss until it was gone.
Background
The E127 series of 2-car electric trains were introduced in 1998, intended as replacements for trains like the 165-series dating from the 1960s. Beyond technological advances, they had a number of practical advantages that made them better suited to increases in passenger numbers, including more and bigger doors per car that meant people could get on and off more quickly. Seating was a mix of transverse and longitudinal seating which provided more open space for standing passengers when the train was full.
While passengers appreciated the fact they could board the trains more quickly, they missed the more comfy seats on the older 165-series with its express train-style transverse seating. Even so, the E127 trains turned out to be extremely rugged and reliable trains. One incident in 2022 is notable, when a lightning strikes in the Niigata region crippled the brand new E129 trains on the Echigo Line and Hakushin Line. Some retired E127s were drafted in to serve the Joetsu Line, freeing up other E129s for the commuter lines. Despite being put to work on a steep, mountainous line they were not designed for — the E127s performed flawlessly.
My review concerns Kato's model of the E127-100 version of the train, designed specifically for the Oito Line and Shinonoi Line local services. These are notable for having a a 'de-icing' pantograph on one of the two cars. This second pantograph is only raised in icy conditions where it scrapes off ice and snow from the overhead wire. When it isn't needed, this pantograph is lowered.
Kato E127-100 (10-1812)
- Powered KuMoHa 127 and KuHa 126 trailer
- Working headlight (can be switched on and off) on both cars
- Tool for accessing the light switch
- Features pantographs on both cars (unlike Kato 10-1811)
- Pre-fitted with standard Kato close couplers
- Optional 'denren' electrical connection boxes for the cab ends
- Optional coupler pocket pieces, A and B, specific to the E127 and E126
- Optional cab-end destination display pieces
- Set of stickers for the destination panels on the sides of the cars and priority seating
- 4-page instruction leaflet, in Japanese
Thankfully, none of the optional extras, even the stickers, are notable by their absence — so if you want to plonk the train straight onto the track and start serving your N-scale commuters, go for it.
This train is DCC-ready in the sense of being ready for Kato's proprietary slide-in cards (rather than sockets or drop-in replacement PCBs). Kato EM13 is needed for the motor car and two Kato FL12 chips are needed for lights at each cab. Optionally, you could fit a Kato FR11 to control the interior lights, if fitted. If you don't add one, the lights stay on all the time the train is on the track — which I think is fine, but might annoy some.
Incidentally, 'denren' is a nickname for the denki renketsu (or electrical coupler). When two units are coupled together, this box allows electrical controls to be shared between the units. If you've ever seen old railwaymen connecting up trains with jumper cables between sockets, you'll know that was quite a laborious task. The 'denren' opens up as the two trains join together, automatically connecting up all the different cables.
Performance and detailing
Performance is excellent, everything you expect from modern Kato, and in fact the new slotless motor used in this model is a smoother and quieter than the motor used in Kato's 2010 release of this train. No traction tyres are fitted, but they aren't necessary, since the motor is more than capable of moving a 2-car train around curves and up reasonable gradients. My train happily goes around quite tight R282 curves without problems. While the motor lacks a flywheel, there's no obvious downside, the slotless motor responding very smoothly to changes in voltage, even at low speed.
Like the 313-1300 reviewed earlier, this train features current collection across both bogies of the power car, but only a single powered bogie. The rationale for this is simple: a single powered bogie is ample for a 2-car train, and if you want to build this up with a second unit, it'd have its own powered bogie. Smaller, lower powered motors draw less current (putting less strain on the transformer) and lack the force to push or pull the other powered car if running at slightly different speeds.
A cosmetic advantage is that smaller motors can be hidden entirely in the bogie and chassis, ensuring the passenger cabin is completely empty. This allows for more realistic interior detailing. Like most Kato passenger trains, this model can be easily upgraded with cool white interior lighting kits (11-211). If you do this, you'll want to add some passengers — I used the cheap-and-cheerful mass produced ones you can buy online easily enough. While they lack the detailing you'd get on premium N-scale people, you'll have to cut off their legs to get them to fit inside the cabin of the car, so buying expensive people makes no sense. They look fine when glimpsed at through the windows!
Although the first E127s were delivered to JR East in 1998, the model represents the train as it looks from 2016 onwards when they were updated to more modern specifications. Most of the changes were internal, but modellers will notice changes to the underfloor equipment, the skirt around the front ends, and changes to the wiring on the roof of the trailer car.
If you look closely, you can also see one set of passenger doors on the trailer car are marked with blue accessibility signs for travellers with prams, pushchairs, and wheelchairs. On the real train, this is the door that station staff will take those users to, laying down a ramp if necessary. Just like on the real trains, Kato have left out one of the benches inside the door and blocked off an area for the accessible lavatory next to it!
Conclusion
Overall, what I like about this train is its thoroughly ordinary appearance. It's not fancy in any way, but looks exactly like train that has to work for a living. The fact it runs very smoothly and quietly, and required very little in terms of additional work before I could run it, just adds to its charm. There isn't (yet) a Sound Card for this train but the generic 'clickity-clack' card works well enough.
For ¥10,450 (about £50) the value is quite good compared to other Japanese trains. Maybe not an absolute steal in the same way as the Local Sen train pack reviewed some time ago, but still a fraction of what you'd pay for a 2-car multiple unit of a British prototype. I think it's worth highlighting the differences between this Kato model and, say, the Graham Farish Class 150 DMU. With an RRP of £250, that model is five times the cost of the Kato one. Is it five times better? Well, it comes with some significant features the Kato model lacks including a built-in speaker (for DCC sound) and 8-pin DCC slots in both cars (one for the motor car, the second for the trailer to control its lights). On the other hand, the Kato model is preconfigured for an easy internal lighting upgrade. Both models have some separately fitted details, but the Farish model is, somewhat, better appointed in this regard, and unlike the Kato model, the Farish one comes with all the necessary decals applied, including tiny ones on the windows.
While I don't think that comparison is unfair, neither do I think it tells the whole story. The UK N-scale market being vastly smaller than the Japanese one, and therefore runs of new models end up smaller and more expensive. Ultimately, the Farish model might be twice as detailed as the Kato one, but not five times so — that's more about the size of the Farish and Kato markets more than anything else. And which is more reliable? Time will tell, but Kato mechanisms are widely regarded as the gold standard in terms of durability and performance — something I'm not sure has been said about the Bachmann mechanisms used in Graham Farish models!





















